Research
Published Articles
Expert Disagreement and the Duty to Vote (2025). Philosophers’ Imprint
(pen access published version | a brief summary for New Work in Philosophy)
Should you Defer to Individual Experts? (2025). Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
Authority or Autonomy? Philosophical and Psychological Perspectives on Deference to Experts (2025). Philosophical Psychology
Co-authored (second author) with Alex Worsnip, Samuel Pratt, Giulia Napolitano, Kurt Gray, and Jeff Greene.
Works-in-Progress (drafts available upon request)
A paper on scientific literatures, higher-order evidence, and unpossessed evidence. (title redacted for review)
Informed Non-Consent: An Epistemic Condition on Mandatory Vaccination
In this paper, I argue for an epistemic condition on permissible mandatory vaccination: those subject to such policies must be in a position to know that the vaccine in question is safe and effective. I then identify some obstacles to being in a position to know that a vaccine is safe and effective: (1) the relevant scientific evidence is inaccessible to most of us, and (2) we are sometimes not in a position to rationally defer to experts. I conclude by suggesting that, in order to promote the satisfaction of the position-to-know condition, the medical and scientific communities should focus their efforts on effectively communicating scientific consensus.